I'm talking to everyone I can about it, finding ways to weave it into distantly-related conversations, and processing some of its information for days - it's that kind of a wake-up and call-to-action book: "The Motherhood Manifesto". I find it's a great next step to the "who's this system working for? and what to do about it?" ponderings I've been having for a while. It covers parental leave, flexible work, childcare and after school programs, healthcare for kids, realistic and fair wages.
- Motherhood is the single biggest risk factor for poverty in old age (partly because nannies earn social security credits while mothers do not, and earn no money at all). 25 percent of new "poverty spells" start when a baby is born. More children will see their parents go through bankrupcy each year than through divorce.
- The wage gap between mothers and non-mothers is bigger than between men and women. Even in studies done with identical resumes, mothers take a significant pay cut (44%) over non-mothers - while fathers were offered a higher salary than non-fathers! Mothers are also significantly less likely to be hired. And when they are...
- It is not illegal in most states to ask a woman if she's a mom (or a single mom) and to offer her a lower salary accordingly. In other words, it's ok to determine hourly wage based on marital and motherhood status. Because employers figure moms, and esp single moms, will have to cover benefits, esp healthcare, for the whole family.
- The US is one of only 4 countries in the world without paid parental leave (the others are Lesotho, Swaziland and Papua New Guinea). (It's also the only industrial nation without any guaranteed vacation or sick days, see a related Slate article touting this as a great issue for presidential candidates to tackle.) And yet there's a strong connection between paid leave and a significant decrease in post-neonatal deaths (non-paid leave has no correlation). Canada gives a year with some pay. In addition fathers spending time with their infants is tied to long term involvement with those children.
- Time watching television is a better predictor of future obesity than diet or exercise. 40,000 kindergarteners are home alone after school (these kids are under 5...); more than 14,000,000 kindergarteners through twelfth grade kids on their own after school without supervision. For most, childcare is a necessity, not a luxury (48% of married mothers bring in half or more of the family's income). The military system of childcare is presented as successful, subsidized, and standardized across the nation.
- "Unless you're Bill Gates, you're just one serious illness away from bankrupcy. Our study is frightening", says Harvard Med School associate professor. Half of the families filing for bankrupcy do so in the wake of a medical problem. And the typical medical bankrupcy is solid middle-class: most have been to college, gotten decent jobs, and bought homes. And about 3/4 of medical bankrupcies had medical coverage when illness struck. And the uninsured? Most of them work; many of them are middle class. The United States remains the only Western nation without universal health insurance coverage. Oh and there really are people who die from not being able to afford appropriate care. Or the prescriptions.
- Minimum wage is not enough to keep even the smallest family above the federal government's extremely low poverty threshold nor does it meet the Self Sufficiency Standard (which calculates how much money working adults need to meet their basic needs without any subsidies). Most of minimum wage earners are adult women (not summer job teenagers). A 52-week full-time job without unpaid breaks at federal minimum wage comes to $10,712 a year (with childcare costing between 4 and 10 grands a year). The minimum wage is so low states and cities on both sides of the rep-dem divide have increased the minimum wage significantly above federal standard.
It's all interrelated - the flex issue and the health issue and the childcare issue, and working longer hours to be able to afford healthcare which compounds the childcare issue. and welfare; the cost of it.
One would think this whole person-based (socialist?!) view of the world would be deplorable for businesses. but it ain't quite so simple. Mothers represent some of the most highly qualified workforce available. And for a little flexibility in their schedule, they're willing to take significant pay cuts. Flextime companies report less turnover, increased job satisfaction and team performance, and lower costs when employees work from home. Not to mention that mothers quitting because they can't juggle motherhood and an inflexible schedule cost companies dearly in turnover, retraining and hiring. Or that motherhood has been shown to make mothers more productive, more organized employees. Take that.
In fact, time and time again, prevention is cheaper than picking up the pieces. Prevention of poverty is cheaper than welfare. Every 1$ spent on at-risk youth in an after-school program brings a return of $10 approx (about $3 for nonrisk youth).
Every $1 spent on good quality childcare for low-income children saved over $7 over time (increased literacy, etc.). Even free preschool for 4 year olds (in Wisconsin) saves money in the long run (e.g. less special ed or repeated grades).
Increased min wage results in savings from improved job performance and lower turnover and disciplinary problems. In fact, employment and payroll growth in the higher minimum wage states performed better than in the remaining states."
And if that still doesn't convince you, then how does it feel to be pointed out as a totally inefficient country? Countries with the same infant mortality rate as the US spend about 1/20th what US citizens spend per person per year. The US spends way more on healthcare per capita than any other nation. with poor results. More money does not equal better care because of the high percentage of private prepaid plans which are notoriously inefficient with dollars. Each procedure has umpteen different negotiated rates, which translates into 20-25% of healthcare dolars spent on administration (Canadians spend 40% less on healthcare yet receive more hospital care and make more doctors' visits and enjoy better access to care. Trimming US costs to Canadian levels would save at least $209 billion annually, enough to fund universal coverage.). The cost of healthcare is rising so much, in fact, that businesses are struggling to keep up, and some fortune 500's are choosing to relocate (North of the border for instance).
Finally...
it's going in the wrong direction:
- the number of uninsured is increasing, while job-linked health coverage is dropping
- the premiums for family coverage have risen 60% from 2000 to 2005
- the maternal pay gap is expanding
- the value of the minimum wage has been decreasing
- economic inequality and economic insecurity have both been rising since the 1970's.
- ceo wage ratio getting much bigger (40 times in 1980's and 500 times today). in no other country is the ratio bigger than 50. in western europe, canada and japan, ceo's make 20 to 30 times what the average worker does, often less.
- the percentage of working women has skyrocketed to 81% in 1999
- for the first time since census starting tracking in 1976, there is a decline in the proportion of mothers of infants in the workforce
- women make up 75% of the elderly poor. it's a number that has been rising.
Much more at MotherhoodManifesto.com (aka momsrising.org). Time to speak up!

